Blog Entry

Final Four locales lead to poor shooting games

Posted on: April 5, 2011 12:35 am
Edited on: April 5, 2011 12:38 am

Posted by Matt Jones

HOUSTON --- Walking into a football stadium and seeing 75,000 people in one place for a basketball game is an impressive sight. With such a large mass of humanity in one place, a collective energy pervades the building and immediately signals to all who are in attendance that an important event is about to take place. From an aesthetic standpoint, it makes the Final Four a tremendous experience.

However as Monday night showed us once again, the football stadium Final Four all too often also produces horrific basketball. The numbers from UConn’s 53-41 victory over Butler suggest it was the worst offensive game in Final Four history. Butler shot 18.8 percent from the field, the lowest percentage of any team in any championship game in tournament history. It was also the lowest shooting percentage of any team in this year’s tournament, obliterating the futility record set by St. Peter’s in shooting 29 percent versus Purdue. UConn may have won the game, but it too contributed to the string of horrendous bricks, going 1-11 from the three point line and becoming the first team to win an NCAA title shooting less than 10 percent from behind the arc.

But the awful shooting didn’t start on Monday. In the Kentucky-UConn game on Saturday night, the Huskies went 1-12 from three point land and won, leading to a preposterous 2-23 total for the weekend. Kentucky shot only 33 percent from the field for the game and went 2-12 from three point land in the first half, even though virtually every one of the looks was completely wide open. In fact, the entire Final Four was one consistent parade of missed open three pointers, leading to a brand of eye-bleeding basketball that does little to sell the college game while played on its biggest stage.

Believe me, I understand the reason these games are played in such massive structures. With 75,000 fans on Saturday and another 70,000 on Monday, the NCAA set a new attendance record for the Final Four and produced not only a large stream of revenue, but also an atmosphere to compete with the biggest sporting events in the United States. So arguing that the NCAA should go back to something resembling a regular arena for the Final Four is unrealistic and akin to arguing that “student-athletes” should miss less class during March.

However we should acknowledge that what we see at the Final Four is not the same game that is played throughout the regular season or in the early rounds of the NCAA tournament. A game in a football stadium leads to a shooting environment that is unlike anything a player will otherwise see. Behind the basket is simply open space, often filled with temporary stands that dont raise immediately as in virtually every arena in America. With no real backdrop to create a context, the basketball goal seems to almost be floating in space. This will often cause even a great shooter to have issues with depth perception that in many cases, he has never previously seen. 

To understand exactly what is occurring, imagine standing in a desert, with no trees, mountains or buildings to help your eyes and brain conceptualize how far a particular object is from you at a given point. Absent the context around you, one is generally guessing to determine distances from a given point, an effect that is exaggerated to an even greater degree in a split-second situation. This occurs on a much smaller level in these football environments, often interfering with the regular routine of a shooter who is used to a regular context in the average basketball arena. Add the additional oddity of a raised court that hovers over the fans in the first couple of rows, and the difference from the players’ norm is real.

The dome effect has never been studied scientifically, but watch any game in such an environment and its power can be proven anecdotally. Over three games in Houston I witnessed not only poor shooting, but more truly bad misses far from their target than I have seen in any games all year. When those games are being had by the four teams playing for a national championship, the effect is even more striking.

The football stadium effect is only going to grow as the NCAA continues to put the Final Four in larger and larger venues. While domes are not new, some of the older buildings would put up large drapes to cover up some sections, which often had a secondary effect of making the arena a bit easier for shooters. Now the NCAA’s policy is go as big as it can get, meaning 75,000 fans will be the norm, not just a one-year attendance burst. That does lead to an amazing show and makes the Final Four experience one to remember. But the basketball game ends up being radically different, and as was the case on Monday night, often brutal to watch.

Category: NCAAB

Since: Dec 3, 2010
Posted on: April 6, 2011 3:36 pm

Final Four locales lead to poor shooting games

Correction Uconn's defense was AMAZING.  In the Shot Clock era champion has given up fewer points per game than uconn did this year (56ppg).  In fact you have to go back to the 85 Villanova team, that held the ball a minute everytime they had it to find someone with a lower PPG allowed that won the tournament.

Since: Mar 6, 2010
Posted on: April 5, 2011 4:52 pm

Final Four locales lead to poor shooting games

UConn's defense was good, but not any better than Butler's. Butler just didn't make anything, near or far, open or contested. They couldn't even make free throws. That alone would have kept them within 4-6 points near the end. Just goes to show you that you can play defense as much as you want, but if you can't make a shot, you are going to lose.

Since: Mar 6, 2010
Posted on: April 5, 2011 4:47 pm

Final Four locales lead to poor shooting games

I don't know if it is the domes or not that cause bad shooting. My beloved Buckeyes shot 31% against Kentucky, and they were playing in a 17,000 seat arena in Newark. Yet, I do think that basketball is meant to be played in arenas, and not in 70,000 seat stadiums. But, the NCAA, that fine model of purity for student athletes (cough cough), puts the Final Four in a dome because it produces 90% of the revenue for the NCAA each year. You will never see a Final Four in an arena again, just because of that.

Since: Jan 22, 2010
Posted on: April 5, 2011 3:34 pm

Final Four locales lead to poor shooting games

Major league baseball provides "hitters' backgrounds" in it's parks and the result is positive. In these large football stadiums the NCAA should eliminate seats in a section of the endzone to provide a similar background. The great money grab dictates these bigger venues, but what will happen if continued poor quality games leads to lower tv ratings and the tv BUCKS drop.

In essence a coach with designs on the "ship" will need 2 teams, one for the regular season and early rounds of Madness that can shoot well from outside, and a second that scores predominately from the paint and can challenge a lot of shots.  337 total points in 3 Final Four games is awful.  Since shooting is the most important fundamental skill in hoops, and the first skill young kids learning to play work on, shouldn't the NCAA quit penalizing the teams and players that utilize that skill?

Since: May 8, 2007
Posted on: April 5, 2011 2:47 pm

I love theories too....

However, theories need to be supported by evidence.

This article should have been delayed by a few hours so you could have looked up some stats on this...

Since: May 27, 2007
Posted on: April 5, 2011 2:28 pm

Final Four locales lead to poor shooting games

Lousy excuse.  I was in Ford Field in '08 when UNC, Mich St, UConn, and Villanova all seemed to do just fine.

Since: Dec 2, 2009
Posted on: April 5, 2011 2:00 pm

Final Four locales lead to poor shooting games

That was not only the worst championship game ever, but may have been one of the most inept basketball games of of the shot clock era. Depth percetion aside, Butler hasnt scored a total of 100 points in TWO championship games. Im glad to see the guy that looks like the Facebook founder is a senior. Heres to hoping that along with his depature, Butler in the Final Four will be a thing of the past too.

Since: Sep 28, 2010
Posted on: April 5, 2011 1:50 pm

Final Four locales lead to poor shooting games

Were both teams shooting at 10' hoops?  If the answer is yes then it was fair.  Don't make excuses make adjustments!

Since: Dec 15, 2007
Posted on: April 5, 2011 1:12 pm

Final Four locales lead to poor shooting games

From experience, I agree with the concept of context of a background.  However, I don't think domed versus non domed makes a difference.  In HS, I played in gyms where the hoop was attached to a wall which gave us context.  At the state tournament, we played what was the same as most basketball arenas.  It did feel like the basket was "floating" for lack of a better term.  It wasn't the same as outside though and I can't tell you why.  It took us about a quarter of the game to get used to it.  I get what he is saying. 

I just don't agree that gradual slope versus steeper slope of the stands makes a difference.  It can't be that big of a difference, there is a backdrop still, and the players should adjust after a few minutes. 

Since: Jun 21, 2009
Posted on: April 5, 2011 12:49 pm

Final Four locales lead to poor shooting games

Have you ever played basketball outside?... same effect.   Butler did not look nervous at all.... don't think they missed 14 of 15 shots around the basket...most of those were blocks... nice try though.
Have you ever played basketball outside with a glass backboard?

I don't think it's an excuse for Butler losing; both teams have to deal with it. The article is about the bad overall shooting during the Final Four, not about why Butler lost.

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or