Blog Entry

Boiler Up: Purdue has to improve its...defense?

Posted on: December 1, 2011 1:36 pm
Edited on: December 1, 2011 1:53 pm
  •  
 



By
Jeff Borzello

On the surface, the numbers look fantastic.

Purdue ranks No. 13 in the country in defensive efficiency, giving up about 89 points per 100 possessions. The Boilermakers have held two teams below 40 points. Essentially, it looks like business as usual for Purdue, which has ranked among the nation’s best in defensive efficiency for the past five years.

Looking closer, though, there seems to be some troubling points. If you take out the games against Northern Illinois and Western Michigan, Purdue’s defensive efficiency drops tremendously. In the other six games, they have allowed better than 1.04 points per possession, which would rank in the middle of the pack nationally.

Iona sped the Boilermakers up in their mid-November matchup, seemingly scoring at will until Scott Machado fouled out late in the game. Temple shot nearly 52 percent from the field, High Point nailed almost 40 percent of its 3-pointers and Miami (Fl.) did well on the offensive glass despite going to a four-guard lineup. In Purdue’s one loss, to Alabama, the Crimson Tide turned up the pressure in the second half and started getting transition baskets.

This is not to say that Purdue is a mediocre defensive team, not at all. But this isn’t the Boilermakers’ squad of the past few years. Ones that had Chris Kramer creating havoc for opposing guards, E’Twaun Moore bodying up on the wings and JaJuan Johnson protecting the rim.

There aren’t many go-to defensive stoppers on the roster right now. Lewis Jackson and Kelsey Barlow can guard the ball effectively, but the team as a whole struggles with big, physical wings. Terone Johnson (above) could help, but having him on the floor instead of Ryne Smith makes Purdue limited offensively. Moreover, they can’t take risks in the halfcourt because there are no intimidating big men guarding the rim. Jacob Lawson has the potential to be a force with his athleticism, but he is still a freshman. Robbie Hummel is currently leading the team in blocked shots, but his athleticism has been limited by multiple knee injuries.

In a half-court setting, Purdue’s physicality and strength will be enough to beat most teams. But teams have scored on the Boilermakers in transition. They allow 1.12 points per possession when the opponent is able to get out and run, which is what Iona did to score 90 points, and what Alabama did in the second half when the Crimson Tide won. Moreover, Temple was able to get easy baskets because it forced turnovers. Purdue’s big men don’t get back too well (outside of Lawson, again), making it easy for athletic opponents to get open opportunities in the fast-break.

How can they get better?

They need to get back in transition, continue limiting turnovers (Purdue takes care of the ball better than anyone in the country), and rebound more consistently. Moreover, they need to rotate better on isolation situations and pick-and-roll plays. Teams are simply getting too many open shots. Giving Terone Johnson and Lawson more minutes might help, but Matt Painter doesn't want to hinder his offense too much.

Purdue will be a contender for an NCAA tournament bid out of the Big Ten, I have no doubt. But in order to play with the big boys – starting on Saturday at Xavier – the Boilermakers need to improve their defense.

And that’s a major change from the past.

Photo: US Presswire

More College Basketball coverage
  •  
Category: NCAAB
Comments

Since: Jan 10, 2010
Posted on: December 5, 2011 4:33 pm
 

Boiler Up: Purdue has to improve its...defense?

I have not looked at last year's stats, but it seems as if Purdue is shooting more shots outside the points (i.e 3 pointers).  I think this is one of many factors to why the Boilers have been burned in transition.  Also remember, that JaJuan Johnson was taking a good amount of outside shots and was in position to get back on defense much better than the current post players who are usually on the blocks when one of Purdue's guards is shooting a three point shot.  Regardless, Purdue needs to make a better effort in getting back on defense when a shot is missed.

 

 




Since: Feb 17, 2008
Posted on: December 2, 2011 5:39 pm
 

Boiler Up: Purdue has to improve its...defense?

Fair point, although the need for improvement is not limited to the defense.  Purdue has put up solid numbers scoring, but until the Miami game had been pretty one dimensional and reliant on the 3. 

Lawson and Johnson's minutes have been increasing, as has both of their offensive productivity.   The big thing they are missing is the presence in the lane that JJohnson provided last year.   Etwaan and Jackson would get beat on penetration no less than this year's team, but this team, including Lawson are a long way from providing the kind of intimidation around the basket that JJohnson created. 

Result is more pressure on the guards to be better and smarter defenders.  Purdue has the athletes to do it, and Painter will get them in better shape by the time the Big10 rolls around.

The game Saturday at Xavier will be a great barometer for how much further they need to go.


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com