Boise inks deal with UT Martin in 2013

So, the 1985 World Series had a Corrupt Replay Booth that Made a Safe Call at 1st Base after reviewing it for 15 Mins after clearly seeing otherwise?

I guess I missed that.

No replays back then, as you well know, but the end result was the same spin.

No replays back then, as you well know, but the end result was the same spin.

Don't you get it, when the bad call goes against them, it doesn't count, but when it does go in their favor, than it's the way the cookie crumbles.  This has been Spinny's theme song from the beginning.  What our dear trolls like Spinny & Shel don't get is that most Boise fans accept that the handful of Boise losses are just that, losses.  I have yet to see a BSU fan whine about bad calls or missed field goals, they happened and the other team deserved to win.  We didn't like it, but we lost, fair and square.  But Sooner fans refuse to do this, I guess, they still count that game as a win, in spite of the final score.  Trust me, Oklahoma and every other team on the planet can point to games in which a bad call gifted them the game, but boy, when the bad call goes against them, oh, mercy.  These fools don't realize that if you held their own team up to the same standard that they want to hold Boise, then these great teams are also not worthy.  In fact, hardly a team in the nation is deserving, no, maybe not a single one.

But of course, the rules for Boise State are the opposite.  That why you have to love our Oklahoma trolls.  This is why neither of these fellows post much on the OU board, even Sooner fans probably can't stand them.  Besides, it's no fun to post on the OU boards, they aren't exciting or controversial.

Boise is.  Thus, Boise threads go on for dozens of pages, threads for most other teams don't.  Oklahoma, you either love them or you don't, nothing to debate.  Boise?  We Broncos stir up lots of debate, and I for one, love it.  I thoroughly enjoy provoking our weak-minded little friends, it's wonderful entertainment when there is no football on!  Shel, Spinny, Gator Lass, and our dear Alabama fans are wonderful, I can't thank them enough.  I love it when they lie and twist statistics.  We get them so mad, that they start calling me names, which is music to my ears.  They can't refute my arguments, so they try to insult.  Little Shel is the best, but Spinny has been going for years!  Life would be boring on these sports boards without them.

Boise is.  Thus, Boise threads go on for dozens of pages, threads for most other teams don't.  Oklahoma, you either love them or you don't, nothing to debate.  Boise?  We Broncos stir up lots of debate, and I for one, love it.  I thoroughly enjoy provoking our weak-minded little friends, it's wonderful entertainment when there is no football on!  Shel, Spinny, Gator Lass, and our dear Alabama fans are wonderful, I can't thank them enough.  I love it when they lie and twist statistics.  We get them so mad, that they start calling me names, which is music to my ears.  They can't refute my arguments, so they try to insult.  Little Shel is the best, but Spinny has been going for years!  Life would be boring on these sports boards without them.

Weak Minded.  That's cute Smiley my boy. Nothing weak about me my friend.

 Shel, Spinny, Gator Lass, and our dear Alabama fans are wonderful, I can't thank them enough. I love it when they lie and twist statistics. We get them so mad, that they start calling me names, which is music to my ears. They can't refute my arguments, so they try to insult.


Here you go trying to act like your the victim here. I can go back through alot of your posts an pull out the insults you spew at other posters but I am not going to do it because everyone already knows it. You insult people in a large number of your posts so just stop acting like your a saint here smiles. Calling people out for what you do yourself make you a hypocrit wouldnt you say.


As far as trying to refute your argument you dont have one. You have yet to prove any argument from a major team either. All you say is they are cowards which you know is wrong but you just want to start an argument.

I love it when they lie and twist statistics.  We get them so mad, that they start calling me names, which is music to my ears.  They can't refute my arguments,

Sure I can.  Have many times over.

What is your "excuse" for Boise's cumulative 10-17 record vs. AQ Football Teams Smiles?

Nothing twisted about that stat.

Sure I can.  Have many times over.

What is your "excuse" for Boise's cumulative 10-17 record vs. AQ Football Teams Smiles?

Nothing twisted about that stat.


Let me lend a hand Smiles.  You would like for Everyone to Only take into account a team that has been playing for the time they actually won some games against AQ teams right SMiles?

You will then attempt to say that those Losses are/were somehow a "Thing of the Past", 'Growing Pains" so to speak, right Smiles?

I say, those Numbers are Accurate and indicative.  I believe they are a very strong indicator as to how Boise would fair in an AQ Conference Smiles. 

Could Boise beat Kansas State Smiles? Maybe.  But K-State would beat Boise more often than vice versa. Can BOise beat Baylor Smiles? Maybe, but Baylor would have the edge over an alloted period of time and NO, Boise doesn't have the better coach.

Bottom Line SMiles, you can't prove me wrong.  Your AD is too cowardly to attempt to Prove anyone Wrong, they are too busy Behind the Curtain trying to look like OZ.

Ole Miss would beat Boise most of the Time Smiles. 

Let me lend a hand Smiles.  You would like for Everyone to Only take into account a team that has been playing for the time they actually won some games against AQ teams right SMiles?

You will then attempt to say that those Losses are/were somehow a "Thing of the Past", 'Growing Pains" so to speak, right Smiles? 

AQs Shmayques. It isn't AQs that have beating Boise lately, its NONAQs. Your inflated self worth is awe inspiring.

So here, allow me.

It is you, SPINocchio, that can't stay anywhere close to consistent.  

So you want to count Boise's losses when Boise was D1aa, but not Boise's wins against the same team when they were NONAQs?Boise's losses count, but not Boise's wins against the same team? Well, sPIN, which is it?

It was you, just a couple days ago that stated Boise's losses to tcu as losses to an AQ, all the while condemning Boise wins against TCU as losses to a lowlife midmajor. Which is it sPIN? 

It is you that states soon-to-be Big12 TCU is an AQ, but fails to acknowledge other soon-to-be programs that also have signed contracts with AQs. Which is it sPIN?  


As to the rest of your post. What is there to prove?  Every analyst in the country says your speculation is wrong, (which doesn't surprise me, since you're hardly ever right). Hell, even your own coach says you are wrong.

Ole Miss would beat Boise most of the Time Smiles. 

 If you really believe that, Go ahead, sPIN, double your losings up. Haven't learned your lesson yet, eh smart guy? Whose fault will it be this time?

Too funny.


 

 

If you really believe that, Go ahead, sPIN, double your losings up. Haven't learned your lesson yet, eh smart guy? Whose fault will it be this time?

Too funny.

I absolutely believe it.  I believe it because Ole Miss is Better than Boise.  Better in every way.  Better Program, better recruiting, bigger school, better academics, better Boosters, better fanbase and a better football team.

Problem is, Boise hides too much for anyone to prove it beyond any doubt which is JUST the way you boise fans like it.

Ole Miss is a Below Mid-Road SEC Football Team, yet by far better than Boise.  Which is exactly what you would find in the Pac 12, Big 10, Big XII etc.

You Boise fans a so incredibly blinded by your own biased fandom.  Amazing.

Oh well, sit back and watch the perrenial Mid-Major powerhouse TCU get throttled on a yearly basis in the Big XII, AGAIN.

I absolutely believe it. 

Then place your bet again, big guy. Its your money.

How's the saying go? Doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results?

I absolutely believe it.  I believe it because Ole Miss is Better than Boise.  Better in every way.  Better Program, better recruiting, bigger school, better academics, better Boosters, better fanbase and a better football team.

Problem is, Boise hides too much for anyone to prove it beyond any doubt which is JUST the way you boise fans like it.

Ole Miss is a Below Mid-Road SEC Football Team, yet by far better than Boise.  Which is exactly what you would find in the Pac 12, Big 10, Big XII etc.

You Boise fans a so incredibly blinded by your own biased fandom.  Amazing.

Well then you are an idiot blinded by your hatred for Boise.  Boise is one of the best teams in the country today, better than your gag artist Chokelahoma Sooners that's for sure.  The experts who evaluate and rank these teams for a living say they are one of the very best.  You want to sit here and say Boise would finish 9th out of 10 Big 12 teams..or Boise = Iowa State...or Ole Miss is a better team than Boise go right ahead and keep sounding like a jealous, idiotic moron.

This very site as well as the final polls had one, yes one Big 12 team ranked higher than Boise.  Okie State who blasted your Sooners out of the stadium - kicked the absolute dog crap out of you 44 to freaking 10.  You put up 10 points against that miserable defense of theirs.  How incredibly embarrassing.  

Oh and this site ranked Iowa State 54 out of 120 teams and Ole Miss at 100th.

Yeah Boise = Iowa State.  Ole Miss is better than Boise.  Boise would finish 9th in the Big 12.  Take a step back and read and process some of these kind of wild, outlandish claims again folks.  It removes all crediblity from the repeated bullcrap points that you spend hours upon hours attempting make .  It makes you look like the bitter, idiotic Boise hating moron that you are, Spinkiller.  Your true colors have been revealed. 

So you want to count Boise's losses when Boise was D1aa, but not Boise's wins against the same team when they were NONAQs?Boise's losses count, but not Boise's wins against the same team? Well, sPIN, which is it?

It was you, just a couple days ago that stated Boise's losses to tcu as losses to an AQ, all the while condemning Boise wins against TCU as losses to a lowlife midmajor. Which is it sPIN? 

I believe I said take em right?

Since Boise joined D-1, they are 10-10 vs AQ Football teams. That's Kansas Numbers my friend. You want to Count your games vs TCU in that tally?  Go right ahead. Boise is 2-2 vs TCU, so that doesn't change a thing.  12-12? Okay, great. Heck throw in your bigtime 1-0 vs Utah if you like.  Your right there neck and neck with Kentucky & Illinois. 

Keep up the Good Work.
 

I believe I said take em right? 

Since Boise joined D-1, they are 10-10 vs AQ Football teams. That's Kansas Numbers my friend. You want to Count your games vs TCU in that tally?  Go right ahead. Boise is 2-2 vs TCU, so that doesn't change a thing.  12-12? Okay, great. Heck throw in your bigtime 1-0 vs Utah if you like.  Your right there neck and neck with Kentucky & Illinois. 

Actually I count Boise 17-17 against those teams since Boise joined D1a. What's that? Over half of them were ranked opponents for Boise. Hmmm.    And what's that? Only 30% were at home for Boise? Hmmm.

Were over half of your precious KY or Ill vs ranked opponents? Were only 30% of their games at home?  Of course not. Not even close. But do keep twisting.

And you and I both know that most of those Boise losses came in their 1st five years of D1a when Boise was the new paid cupcake and nearly all on the road. Not so, anymore. 

So you're still double talking and it still doesn't hold water.

Hell, there's about a dozen more NONAQs that have a .500 or better record vs your precious AQs when you take away your precious AQ's home advantage. Not so tough then, are they.  

  

And you and I both know that most of those Boise losses came in their 1st five years of D1a when Boise was the new paid cupcake and nearly all on the road. Not so, anymore. 

Now its the first Five years need to be discounted due to growing pains.

How about this year?  What happens this year genius?

Hell, there's about a dozen more NONAQs that have a .500 or better record vs your precious AQs when you take away your precious AQ's home advantage.

Are you actually claiming Boise to have a Huge Home Field Advantage in a 37k Stadium? Maybe to UC Davis my friend but that's called a Practice Field in Norman. 

The University of Oklahoma has a better Winning % in STILLWATER ( and yes it is UGLY) than they do Norman against our own in-state rivals. 

Neither OU nor Texas has played each other on their Home Fields in oer 60 years.

DO you think OU is afraid to go beat the crap out of K-State in Manhattan? Really? Do you really believe OU is afraid to play Boise in Boise but will gladly Travel to Tuscaloosa Alabama, Tallahassee Fl, and South Bend Indiana?

I think you have an over inflated view of "Home Field" and I also believe the reason is Obvious. 

 

How about this year?  What happens this year genius? 

You mean will Boise have a better record than your OU did in '09? Is that what you're getting at, school boy? Or maybe you think OU has the corner market on losing 5 in one season?

Or did you mean for OU? Will they be preseason overated like they are in most seasons? Probably, since OU is the MOST overated program in the country from the precious self annointed AQ conferences. NOT one of the most overated, THE MOST OVERATED.

Neither OU nor Texas has played each other on their Home Fields in oer 60 years.

That's nice.  More tea in China?   I know there isn't a single AQ that consistently has a winning record at a ranked opponent's venue, like the NONAQS are consistently forced to do if they want to compete. 

Are you actually claiming Boise to have a Huge Home Field Advantage in a 37k Stadium? Maybe to UC Davis my friend but that's called a Practice Field in Norman.

Well, I suppose you will find out, if you can get tickets. The oddsmakers have Boise home field rated as one of the highest.  

DO you think OU is afraid to go beat the crap out of K-State in Manhattan? Really? Do you really believe OU is afraid to play Boise in Boise but will gladly Travel to Tuscaloosa Alabama, Tallahassee Fl, and South Bend Indiana?

Man, what a piece of work. I never said anything even remotely close to what your flapping about. 

What I said was that your precious AQs that you keep flapping about aren't so precious when they suddenly lose that 3-6 pt home advantage. And you come back with how long 2 of the 65 AQs have enjoyed playing at a neutral site? WOW.

I think you have an over inflated view of "Home Field" and I also believe the reason is Obvious.

Intresting that all the stats show home field advantage as being highly significant. I also highly doubt that you have ever been around a program that didn't play the majority of their games in their home, or you would know better..


I think that- what you think and what is, don't share many similar traits

Out

Well, I suppose you will find out, if you can get tickets. The oddsmakers have Boise home field rated as one of the highest.

Against WHO? The "oddsmakers" say Boise will beat UT Martin & UC Davis in Boise? 

Man, I'm with them.  I think Boise can take em.  What a tough venue.   

You mean will Boise have a better record than your OU did in '09? Is that what you're getting at, school boy? Or maybe you think OU has the corner market on losing 5 in one season?

Or did you mean for OU? Will they be preseason overated like they are in most seasons? Probably, since OU is the MOST overated program in the country from the precious self annointed AQ conferences. NOT one of the most overated, THE MOST OVERATED.

Oh it's so true, someday.  Ask any educated fan of college football that doesn't reside in that flat, windy, dusty, disgusting, ugly, cesspool of a state and they will confirm that very fact.  Chokelahoma is the most overrated team in the country hands down.  They underperform, underprepare, underachieve, and underwhelm year in and year out....and when it comes to playing big games Big Game Bob and his crew flat out suck.  Choke artists......and everyone knows it to be a fact.

Oh it's so true, someday.  Ask any educated fan of college football that doesn't reside in that flat, windy, dusty, disgusting, ugly, cesspool of a state and they will confirm that very fact.  Chokelahoma is the most overrated team in the country hands down.  They underperform, underprepare, underachieve, and underwhelm year in and year out....and when it comes to playing big games Big Game Bob and his crew flat out suck.  Choke artists......and everyone knows it to be a fact.

Who was the supposed #4 team that Lost at HOME to an unranked TCU team that lost to SMU last season?

That team is Boise State.

Now, when your little program grows up and learns how to schedule real football teams every week, and can PROVE they belong in the conversation, I will be all for them.

As it is now, they are a mockery made of Pretending & smoke and mirrors. 

You keep hanging on the Skirts that rank boise high so to promote their agenda, and I will continue to speak the truth.

Boise=Baylor (Baylor is 1-20 vs. OU, which once again proves any team can do what boise has done on rare occasion).

Who was the supposed #4 team that Lost at HOME to an unranked TCU team

TCU finished ranked 13th in the nation and ahead of your Chokelahoma Sooners yet again for the third year in a row you Moron.  It doesn't matter what they were or weren't ranked when Boise played them, it's where they finished.  TCU is a dang strong football team.  Like Boise they are one of the very best in the country.

TCU finished ranked 13th in the nation

And their benefit of the doubt garbage run is officially over.

Welcome to the Big XII.

AQs Shmayques. It isn't AQs that have beating Boise lately, its NONAQs. Your inflated self worth is awe inspiring.

Too funny. 

Boise is 10-17 vs AQ's and 368-128 against Non AQ's.

Can't see the disparity Boise fanatic?

Bottom Line SMiles, you can't prove me wrong.

Of course, and you can't prove yourself right either.  Woulda and shoulda can't be proven nor disproven.  That's why you are so hilarious, Spinny.

Here is something to try.  Deal with real games played by teams with the makeup that they have now, not teams from the previous century.  Deal with the present, not the distant past.  But hey, I understand, the present hasn't been so kind to your squad, better to live back around the turn of the century. 

You see, unlike you, I don't construct paper tigers and straw men.  I've made my desire for my school to play teams like Oklahoma very clear, and unlike you, I put my money where my mouth is.  So why do you simply repeat you same old bogus "statisitics" instead of doing the same?  Why not join me in advocating that all schools, my own included, play more meaningful nonconference games? 

Probably because you know that Boise has racked up impressive victories lately.  Probably because your school has also choked going down the stretch.  Probably because you realize that your school isn't serious about playing Boise as an equal, they have no desire to play in Boise.  And finally, probably because you really are weak minded, your loud protests only prove it.  Any so-called Oklahoma fan who spends hours on a Boise State thread has some kind of an issue, that's certain.

But whatever you do, Spinny, don't stop stewing and playing internet tough guy.  My experience is that big talkers on line are just that, all talk.

 These fools don't realize that if you held their own team up to the same standard that they want to hold Boise, then these great teams are also not worthy.


smiles if the standards were the same for Boise as for YOU, Boise would not have the wins that they do, nor would they be more then a dot on the map. So see the standards aren't the same and they are stacked in Boise favor. 

As for Boise fans you haven't heard whining, look no further the gr84play, he is whining about the lucky win nevada got over Boise and, its  over what did you say about field goals, yes two missed Boise field goals. WHINING  WHINING WHINING.

So, the 1985 World Series had a Corrupt Replay Booth that Made a Safe Call at 1st Base after reviewing it for 15 Mins after clearly seeing otherwise?

I guess I missed that.

Get over it, Spinkiller.  Oregon beat OU on that day no matter how badly you refuse to accept it.  It was a bad call on a crucial play, but bad calls happen all the time, even in some cases when the play is reviewed in the booth.

Hey, as painful as it is for me to say this, I've watched Kyle Brotzman's 26 yard field goal attempt with 2 seconds left in Reno time after time.  I know Nevada uses short goal posts, but I swear that kick went in when you watch the replay.  I thought he sqeezed it just inside of those goalposts.  But you know what?  At the end of the day Boise lost that game.  They lost it to the 13th ranked team on the road.  Nevada kicked out butts in that second half while our guys threw it into cruise control after dominating the first half.  We choked plain and simple.  They wanted it more and they earned every bit of that win.......whether I thought the kick was good or not is irrelevant.  Our kids lost the game.  When the final gun sounded the scoreboard read Nevada 34, Boise 31. 

Get over it, Spinkiller.  Oregon beat OU on that day no matter how badly you refuse to accept it.  It was a bad call on a crucial play, but bad calls happen all the time, even in some cases when the play is reviewed in the booth.

Wrong. It wasn't a "Bad Call". It was a SERIES of Corrupted calls and people were fired and banned for them.  A Big XII Pac 10 series was cancelled.

Bad Calls are Mistakes made, these weren't mistakes, they were obvious, purposeful, need driven corruption of a college football game.

Try as you may to draw parallels to other games (there aren't any), myself, other players, boosters and OU will not acknowledge anything but an asterisks for that game and OU remains 11-0 vs. Oregon.

But you know what?  At the end of the day Boise lost that game.  They lost it to the 13th ranked team on the road.  Nevada kicked out butts in that second half while our guys threw it into cruise control after dominating the first half.  We choked plain and simple.  They wanted it more and they earned every bit of that win.......whether I thought the kick was good or not is irrelevant.  Our kids lost the game.  When the final gun sounded the scoreboard read Nevada 34, Boise 31. 

Correct.