I am not sure if you got the point? The point is I believe Bynum and Gasol were better than Wade and Bosh last year as Miami fan, I will trade for the bigger two any time.No, you didn't state you considered Bynum and Gasol better than Wade and Bosh. But of course you would trade for the bigger two for a team that lacks side and that being their biggest weakness. Though I don't think that Lebron would be playing the same time of game if he had the two Lakers bigs. Lebron's game improved this year when he played closer to the basket and took less jump shots and 3-pointers. That Lakers already have a tough time trying to find space in the paint with both Bynum and Gasol on the floor, epecially after getting away from the Triangle offense that requires spacing. Odom was also a big help, where he allowed space for Bynum that Gasol could not. A lot of the Lakers problems last season was spacing.
By some reason, you kept on twisting the other points also. I already made my point, please back up and check. I really don't want to say the same thing over again.
|
-
Join the "Heat Haters" club now!August 4, 2012 9:25 pm
You obviously don't know what context means. It's not just the comments that I wrote, it's the statement around my comment which gives it meaning. Davwy- Seriously, are you this dumb? Go back and re-read what you wrote. It's the first post on this page. You are crying about 'context' and say i dont know the meaning because i didnt take the stsatement 'around' your comment. Look again. I took your ENTIRE statement. You're response was two paragraphs. I quoted them both. I know you are running in here to try defend a fellow laker fan who inadvertantly called you a clown. But making up this ''it's out of context'' line of BS is amazing, even for you. again.. your post in response to kobe was 2 paragraphs long... i responded to each paragraphs. so instead of trying to talk down to people about not knowing the meaning or words, maybe you should actually re-read the entire response and possibility brush up on your memory and reading comprehension skills. |
|
-
Join the "Heat Haters" club now!August 5, 2012 4:14 am
Seriously, are you this dumb? Go back and re-read what you wrote. It's the first post on this page. You are crying about 'context' and say i dont know the meaning because i didnt take the stsatement 'around' your comment. Look again. I took your ENTIRE statement. You're response was two paragraphs. I quoted them both. I know you are running in here to try defend a fellow laker fan who inadvertantly called you a clown. But making up this ''it's out of context'' line of BS is amazing, even for you.Flauge, this is really sad. You really don't know what context means. And the funny thing is, you call me dumb and go on and try to explain to me what context is by giving me an example of taking something out of context, right after I define context for you. Flauge, those two paragraphs of mine only have proper meaning when placed within the entire conversation I had with ucfalu. What you did was to take my two paragraphs out of the entire conversation, in other words, you took my two paragraphs out of the context of the conversation, then claimed it meant something other than what the original intent of paragrahp was when it was in context. The comments before my paragraphs and the comments after it defines what imy paragraphs mean. What you are doing is the perfect example of taking something out of context... and suddenly, I'm the dummy? I may be somewhat dyslexic and jumble my words around a bit on the boards, but I think I understand when something is in context and out of context, considering I write for a living, and teach writing part-time to grad students. But maybe there is a new meaning that applies to stuff only written on these boards. |
|
-
Join the "Heat Haters" club now!August 4, 2012 9:30 pm
unless of course you are trying to say arguing over mike beasleys and mike millers contracts were the context of your Kobe Bryant can win with gasol and bynum argument. if that's the case you need to look up the word context.
i realize someone just a few posts up accused you of taking things out of context, so the idea of this is fresh in your head, but just because you hear someone say it to you, doesnt mean it is true whenever you want it to be. again.. you wrote two paragraphs.. i quoted them both. jefe is just not smart enough to follow the argument. hence him making fun of your sample size. |
|
-
Join the "Heat Haters" club now!August 4, 2012 9:36 pm
maybe you should actually re-read the entire response and possibility possibly brush up on your memory and reading comprehension skills.
|
|
-
Join the "Heat Haters" club now!August 4, 2012 9:49 pm
Flauge, maybe you should think about finally checking out of clown school - six and a half years is way too long...you could've easily graduated in four...unless, of course, you're pursuing a clown masters degree.
|